Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Larry O'Neil Faulk, 04-15988 (2005)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Number: 04-15988 Visitors: 10
Filed: Aug. 18, 2005
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 04-15988 AUGUST 18, 2005 Non-Argument Calendar THOMAS K. KAHN CLERK D.C. Docket No. 03-00108-CR-WDO-5 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus LARRY O’NEIL FAULK, Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Georgia (August 18, 2005) Before: CARNES, MARCUS and COX, Circuit Judges. BY THE COURT: Brian T. Randal
More
                                                         [DO NOT PUBLISH]

               IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                        FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT                    FILED
                                                           U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
                                                             ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                                No. 04-15988                   AUGUST 18, 2005
                            Non-Argument Calendar             THOMAS K. KAHN
                                                                   CLERK


                     D.C. Docket No. 03-00108-CR-WDO-5


UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                         Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus


LARRY O’NEIL FAULK,

                                                         Defendant-Appellant.


                  Appeal from the United States District Court
                      for the Middle District of Georgia

                                (August 18, 2005)

Before: CARNES, MARCUS and COX, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

      Brian T. Randall, appointed counsel for Larry O’Neil Faulk in this direct

criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v.
California, 
386 U.S. 738
, 
87 S. Ct. 1396
, 
18 L. Ed. 2d 493
(1967). Our independent

review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit

of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the record reveals no

issues of arguable merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and

Faulk’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.




                                          2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer