Filed: Nov. 09, 2005
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED _ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT November 9, 2005 No. 04-16558 THOMAS K. KAHN Non-Argument Calendar CLERK _ D. C. Docket No. 04-00031-CR-KRS UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus RUBEN GALVAN-PELAYO, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (November 9, 2005) Before EDMONDSON, Chief Judge, TJOFLAT and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED _ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT November 9, 2005 No. 04-16558 THOMAS K. KAHN Non-Argument Calendar CLERK _ D. C. Docket No. 04-00031-CR-KRS UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus RUBEN GALVAN-PELAYO, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (November 9, 2005) Before EDMONDSON, Chief Judge, TJOFLAT and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges...
More
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
FILED
________________________ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
November 9, 2005
No. 04-16558
THOMAS K. KAHN
Non-Argument Calendar CLERK
________________________
D. C. Docket No. 04-00031-CR-KRS
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
RUBEN GALVAN-PELAYO,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
_________________________
(November 9, 2005)
Before EDMONDSON, Chief Judge, TJOFLAT and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Michael O. Donaldson, appointed counsel for Ruben Galvan-Pelayo in this
direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct.
1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals
that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Galvan-Pelayo’s conviction and
sentence are AFFIRMED.
2