Filed: Dec. 09, 2005
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED _ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT December 9, 2005 No. 05-11463 THOMAS K. KAHN Non-Argument Calendar CLERK _ D. C. Docket No. 03-00277-CR-T-30-TBM UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus EFREN DANIEL MARQUEZ-SILVA, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (December 9, 2005) Before CARNES, PRYOR and COX, Circuit Judges. PER CURIA
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED _ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT December 9, 2005 No. 05-11463 THOMAS K. KAHN Non-Argument Calendar CLERK _ D. C. Docket No. 03-00277-CR-T-30-TBM UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus EFREN DANIEL MARQUEZ-SILVA, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (December 9, 2005) Before CARNES, PRYOR and COX, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM..
More
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED
________________________ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
December 9, 2005
No. 05-11463 THOMAS K. KAHN
Non-Argument Calendar CLERK
________________________
D. C. Docket No. 03-00277-CR-T-30-TBM
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
EFREN DANIEL MARQUEZ-SILVA,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
_________________________
(December 9, 2005)
Before CARNES, PRYOR and COX, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Duilio A. Espinosa-Montalban, appointed counsel for Efren Daniel
Marquez-Silva in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further
representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct. 1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of
the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the
appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no
arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and
Marquez-Silva’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.
2