Filed: Oct. 25, 2005
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS _ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT October 25, 2005 No. 05-11728 THOMAS K. KAHN Non-Argument Calendar CLERK _ D.C. Docket No. 04-00106-CR-3-LAC UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus DARREN WAYNE EDEKER, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida _ (October 25, 2005) Before BLACK, BARKETT and HILL, Circuit Judges PER CURIAM: Gwend
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS _ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT October 25, 2005 No. 05-11728 THOMAS K. KAHN Non-Argument Calendar CLERK _ D.C. Docket No. 04-00106-CR-3-LAC UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus DARREN WAYNE EDEKER, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida _ (October 25, 2005) Before BLACK, BARKETT and HILL, Circuit Judges PER CURIAM: Gwendo..
More
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FILED
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
________________________ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
October 25, 2005
No. 05-11728 THOMAS K. KAHN
Non-Argument Calendar CLERK
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 04-00106-CR-3-LAC
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
DARREN WAYNE EDEKER,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Florida
_________________________
(October 25, 2005)
Before BLACK, BARKETT and HILL, Circuit Judges
PER CURIAM:
Gwendolyn Spivey, appointed counsel for Darren Wayne Edeker in this
direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct.
1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals
that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Edeker’s conviction and
sentence are AFFIRMED.
2