Filed: Dec. 23, 2005
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ FILED No. 05-13230 U.S. COURT OF APPEALS Non-Argument Calendar ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ December 23, 2005 THOMAS K. KAHN D.C. Docket No. 05-00001-CR-4-RH-WCS CLERK UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus KEITH DEVON MANN, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida _ (December 23, 2005) Before ANDERSON, DUBINA and HULL, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ FILED No. 05-13230 U.S. COURT OF APPEALS Non-Argument Calendar ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ December 23, 2005 THOMAS K. KAHN D.C. Docket No. 05-00001-CR-4-RH-WCS CLERK UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus KEITH DEVON MANN, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida _ (December 23, 2005) Before ANDERSON, DUBINA and HULL, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: R..
More
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
FILED
No. 05-13230 U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
Non-Argument Calendar ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________ December 23, 2005
THOMAS K. KAHN
D.C. Docket No. 05-00001-CR-4-RH-WCS CLERK
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
KEITH DEVON MANN,
Defendant-Appellant.
__________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Florida
_________________________
(December 23, 2005)
Before ANDERSON, DUBINA and HULL, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Randolph P. Murrell, appointed appellate counsel for Keith Devon Mann in this direct
criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a
brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct. 1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our
independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of
the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable
issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Mann’s conviction and
sentence are AFFIRMED.