Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Michael F. Fagan v. City of Marco Island, 05-14524 (2005)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Number: 05-14524 Visitors: 6
Filed: Nov. 03, 2005
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 05-14524 NOVEMBER 3, 2005 Non-Argument Calendar THOMAS K. KAHN CLERK D. C. Docket No. 04-00494-CV-FTM-33SPC MICHAEL F. FAGAN, Plaintiffs-Appellant, versus CITY OF MARCO ISLAND, A. WILLIAM MOSS, individually, ROGER REINKE, individually, Defendants-Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida (November 3, 2005) Before TJOFLAT
More
[DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 05-14524 NOVEMBER 3, 2005 Non-Argument Calendar THOMAS K. KAHN CLERK D. C. Docket No. 04-00494-CV-FTM-33SPC MICHAEL F. FAGAN, Plaintiffs-Appellant, versus CITY OF MARCO ISLAND, A. WILLIAM MOSS, individually, ROGER REINKE, individually, Defendants-Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida (November 3, 2005) Before TJOFLAT, CARNES and PRYOR, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: In this case, the district court, dismissing appellant’s claims, held that appellant’s allegations failed to state a claim under the First and Fourteenth Amendments allegations for the infringement of appellant’s rights of free speech and freedom of association. Appellant now appeals the court’s rulings. For the reasons stated in the district court’s dispositive order of July 15, 2005, we agree that appellant’s allegations fail to state a claim for the infringement of either rights—free speech or freedom of association. AFFIRMED. 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer