Filed: Jan. 30, 2006
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED _ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 05-10185 JANUARY 30, 2006 Non-Argument Calendar THOMAS K. KAHN CLERK _ D. C. Docket No. 02-00599-CR-B-W UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus RANDALL BEVELLE, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama _ (January 30, 2006) Before BLACK, CARNES and PRYOR, Circuit Judges PER CURIAM: Theresa A.
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED _ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 05-10185 JANUARY 30, 2006 Non-Argument Calendar THOMAS K. KAHN CLERK _ D. C. Docket No. 02-00599-CR-B-W UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus RANDALL BEVELLE, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama _ (January 30, 2006) Before BLACK, CARNES and PRYOR, Circuit Judges PER CURIAM: Theresa A. ..
More
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED
________________________ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-10185 JANUARY 30, 2006
Non-Argument Calendar THOMAS K. KAHN
CLERK
________________________
D. C. Docket No. 02-00599-CR-B-W
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
RANDALL BEVELLE,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Alabama
_________________________
(January 30, 2006)
Before BLACK, CARNES and PRYOR, Circuit Judges
PER CURIAM:
Theresa A. Terrebonne, appointed counsel for Randall Bevelle in this direct
criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct.
1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals
that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Bevelle’s conviction and
sentence is AFFIRMED.
2