Filed: Jun. 30, 2006
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED _ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 05-11899 JUNE 30, 2006 Non-Argument Calendar THOMAS K. KAHN _ CLERK D.C. Docket No. 04-00177-CR-J-25-HTS UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus SHELDON DANE CLARK, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (June 30, 2006) Before DUBINA, HULL and WILSON, Circuit Judges PER CURIAM: Rodney G. G
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED _ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 05-11899 JUNE 30, 2006 Non-Argument Calendar THOMAS K. KAHN _ CLERK D.C. Docket No. 04-00177-CR-J-25-HTS UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus SHELDON DANE CLARK, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (June 30, 2006) Before DUBINA, HULL and WILSON, Circuit Judges PER CURIAM: Rodney G. Gr..
More
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED
________________________ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-11899 JUNE 30, 2006
Non-Argument Calendar THOMAS K. KAHN
________________________ CLERK
D.C. Docket No. 04-00177-CR-J-25-HTS
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
SHELDON DANE CLARK,
Defendant-Appellant.
__________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the
Middle District of Florida
_________________________
(June 30, 2006)
Before DUBINA, HULL and WILSON, Circuit Judges
PER CURIAM:
Rodney G. Gregory, retained counsel for Sheldon Dane Clark in this direct
criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct.
1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals
that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Clark’s conviction and sentence
are AFFIRMED.
2