Filed: Mar. 15, 2006
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS _ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT MARCH 15, 2006 No. 05-14565 THOMAS K. KAHN Non-Argument Calendar CLERK _ D. C. Docket No. 04-00114-CR-4 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus LAMAR JABBAR MCGILL, a.k.a. Tony Green, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia _ (March 15, 2006) Before TJOFLAT, ANDERSON and WILSON, Circuit Judges.
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS _ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT MARCH 15, 2006 No. 05-14565 THOMAS K. KAHN Non-Argument Calendar CLERK _ D. C. Docket No. 04-00114-CR-4 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus LAMAR JABBAR MCGILL, a.k.a. Tony Green, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia _ (March 15, 2006) Before TJOFLAT, ANDERSON and WILSON, Circuit Judges. ..
More
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FILED
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
________________________ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
MARCH 15, 2006
No. 05-14565 THOMAS K. KAHN
Non-Argument Calendar CLERK
________________________
D. C. Docket No. 04-00114-CR-4
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
LAMAR JABBAR MCGILL,
a.k.a. Tony Green,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Georgia
_________________________
(March 15, 2006)
Before TJOFLAT, ANDERSON and WILSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
John M. Tatum, appointed counsel for Lamar Jabbar McGill in this direct
criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct.
1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals
that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and McGill’s conviction and
sentence is AFFIRMED.
2