Filed: Jul. 24, 2006
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED _ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT July 24, 2006 No. 06-10613 THOMAS K. KAHN Non-Argument Calendar CLERK _ D. C. Docket No. 03-00445-CR-T-23-EAJ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JOSE EUSEBIO VALENCIA-AGUIRRE, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (July 24, 2006) Before EDMONDSON, Chief Judge, TJOFLAT and MARCUS, Circuit
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED _ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT July 24, 2006 No. 06-10613 THOMAS K. KAHN Non-Argument Calendar CLERK _ D. C. Docket No. 03-00445-CR-T-23-EAJ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JOSE EUSEBIO VALENCIA-AGUIRRE, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (July 24, 2006) Before EDMONDSON, Chief Judge, TJOFLAT and MARCUS, Circuit ..
More
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED
________________________ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
July 24, 2006
No. 06-10613 THOMAS K. KAHN
Non-Argument Calendar CLERK
________________________
D. C. Docket No. 03-00445-CR-T-23-EAJ
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
JOSE EUSEBIO VALENCIA-AGUIRRE,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
_________________________
(July 24, 2006)
Before EDMONDSON, Chief Judge, TJOFLAT and MARCUS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
In this appeal following a remand to correct an error under United States v.
Booker,
543 U.S. 220,
125 S. Ct. 738,
160 L. Ed. 2d 621 (2005), Terry Clifton
Christian, appointed counsel for Jose Eusebio Valencia-Aguirre, has filed a motion
to withdraw on appeal supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v.
California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct. 1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent
review of the record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the
appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no
arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and
Valencia-Aguirre’s sentences are AFFIRMED.
2