Filed: Nov. 27, 2006
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED _ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT November 27, 2006 No. 06-12881 THOMAS K. KAHN Non-Argument Calendar CLERK _ D. C. Docket No. 04-00080-CR-3-MCR UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JOSE IGNACIO MACIA, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida _ (November 27, 2006) Before EDMONDSON, Chief Judge, ANDERSON and BARKETT, Circuit J
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED _ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT November 27, 2006 No. 06-12881 THOMAS K. KAHN Non-Argument Calendar CLERK _ D. C. Docket No. 04-00080-CR-3-MCR UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JOSE IGNACIO MACIA, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida _ (November 27, 2006) Before EDMONDSON, Chief Judge, ANDERSON and BARKETT, Circuit Ju..
More
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED
________________________ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
November 27, 2006
No. 06-12881 THOMAS K. KAHN
Non-Argument Calendar CLERK
________________________
D. C. Docket No. 04-00080-CR-3-MCR
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
JOSE IGNACIO MACIA,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Florida
_________________________
(November 27, 2006)
Before EDMONDSON, Chief Judge, ANDERSON and BARKETT, Circuit
Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Chet Kaufman, appointed counsel for Jose Ignacio Macia in this direct
criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct.
1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals
that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Macia’s conviction and sentence
are AFFIRMED.
2