Filed: Dec. 26, 2006
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS _ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT DEC 26, 2006 No. 06-14478 THOMAS K. KAHN Non-Argument Calendar CLERK _ D. C. Docket No. 05-00230-CV-WS-B COCA-COLA BOTTLING CO., CONSOLIDATED, Inc. Plaintiff-Appellant, versus INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS, CHAUFFEURS, WAREHOUSEMAN & HELPERS LOCAL 991, Defendant-Appellee. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Alabama _ (Dece
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS _ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT DEC 26, 2006 No. 06-14478 THOMAS K. KAHN Non-Argument Calendar CLERK _ D. C. Docket No. 05-00230-CV-WS-B COCA-COLA BOTTLING CO., CONSOLIDATED, Inc. Plaintiff-Appellant, versus INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS, CHAUFFEURS, WAREHOUSEMAN & HELPERS LOCAL 991, Defendant-Appellee. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Alabama _ (Decem..
More
[DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ________________________ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT DEC 26, 2006 No. 06-14478 THOMAS K. KAHN Non-Argument Calendar CLERK ________________________ D. C. Docket No. 05-00230-CV-WS-B COCA-COLA BOTTLING CO., CONSOLIDATED, Inc. Plaintiff-Appellant, versus INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS, CHAUFFEURS, WAREHOUSEMAN & HELPERS LOCAL 991, Defendant-Appellee. ________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Alabama _________________________ (December 26, 2006) Before BIRCH, WILSON and PRYOR, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: In view of this Court’s ruling in a companion case, Coca-Cola Bottling Co., Consolidated v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehouseman & Helpers Local 991, No. 06-11338 (11th Cir. Dec. 13, 2006), wherein the merits involved in this case were considered, we VACATE the judgment of the District Court, and REMAND this case (involving only the issue of attorneys fees) to the District Court for reconsideration in light of our decision in No. 06-11338. VACATED and REMANDED. 2
