Filed: Aug. 02, 2007
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS _ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT AUGUST 2, 2007 No. 06-12820 THOMAS K. KAHN Non-Argument Calendar CLERK _ D. C. Docket No. 05-00272-CR-J-20-TEM UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus EDUARDO IRVIN, a.k.a. Marc Jean Phillipe, a.k.a. Wayne Alfanso Wilmot, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (August 2, 2007) Before BIRCH, BA
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS _ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT AUGUST 2, 2007 No. 06-12820 THOMAS K. KAHN Non-Argument Calendar CLERK _ D. C. Docket No. 05-00272-CR-J-20-TEM UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus EDUARDO IRVIN, a.k.a. Marc Jean Phillipe, a.k.a. Wayne Alfanso Wilmot, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (August 2, 2007) Before BIRCH, BAR..
More
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FILED
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
________________________ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
AUGUST 2, 2007
No. 06-12820 THOMAS K. KAHN
Non-Argument Calendar CLERK
________________________
D. C. Docket No. 05-00272-CR-J-20-TEM
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
EDUARDO IRVIN,
a.k.a. Marc Jean Phillipe,
a.k.a. Wayne Alfanso Wilmot,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
_________________________
(August 2, 2007)
Before BIRCH, BARKETT and PRYOR, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Lynn Palmer Bailey, appointed appellate counsel for Eduardo Irvin, has filed
a motion to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders
v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct. 1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our
independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the
relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the
entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is
GRANTED, and Irvin’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.
2