Filed: May 22, 2007
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED _ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 06-13624 MAY 22, 2007 _ THOMAS K. KAHN CLERK D. C. Docket No. 04-02758 CV-SLB-NE MARIE ANTOINETTE LINDSEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus HUBBARD & DRAKE GENERAL MECHANICAL CONTRACTORS, INC., Defendant-Appellee. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama _ (May 22, 2007) Before EDMONDSON, Chief Judge, HULL, Circuit Judge, and FOR
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED _ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 06-13624 MAY 22, 2007 _ THOMAS K. KAHN CLERK D. C. Docket No. 04-02758 CV-SLB-NE MARIE ANTOINETTE LINDSEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus HUBBARD & DRAKE GENERAL MECHANICAL CONTRACTORS, INC., Defendant-Appellee. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama _ (May 22, 2007) Before EDMONDSON, Chief Judge, HULL, Circuit Judge, and FORR..
More
[DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED ________________________ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 06-13624 MAY 22, 2007 ________________________ THOMAS K. KAHN CLERK D. C. Docket No. 04-02758 CV-SLB-NE MARIE ANTOINETTE LINDSEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus HUBBARD & DRAKE GENERAL MECHANICAL CONTRACTORS, INC., Defendant-Appellee. ________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama _________________________ (May 22, 2007) Before EDMONDSON, Chief Judge, HULL, Circuit Judge, and FORRESTER,* District Judge. PER CURIAM: After review and oral argument, we find no reversible error in the district * Honorable J. Owen Forrester, United States District Judge for the Northern District of Georgia, sitting by designation. court’s order and contemporaneous memorandum opinion, filed on June 1, 2006, which granted Defendant-Appellee’s motion for summary judgment on Plaintiff- Appellant’s claims and dismissed Plaintiff-Appellant’s claims with prejudice. Accordingly, we affirm. AFFIRMED. 2
