Filed: Mar. 21, 2007
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED _ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 06-15204 MARCH 21, 2007 Non-Argument Calendar THOMAS K. KAHN _ CLERK D.C. Docket No. 06-00005-CR-4 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus MARCELINO RAMIREZ RABELO, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia _ (March 21, 2007) Before TJOFLAT, BLACK and MARCUS, Circuit Judges PER CURIAM: Stephe
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED _ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 06-15204 MARCH 21, 2007 Non-Argument Calendar THOMAS K. KAHN _ CLERK D.C. Docket No. 06-00005-CR-4 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus MARCELINO RAMIREZ RABELO, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia _ (March 21, 2007) Before TJOFLAT, BLACK and MARCUS, Circuit Judges PER CURIAM: Stephen..
More
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED
________________________ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-15204 MARCH 21, 2007
Non-Argument Calendar THOMAS K. KAHN
________________________ CLERK
D.C. Docket No. 06-00005-CR-4
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
MARCELINO RAMIREZ RABELO,
Defendant-Appellant.
__________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Georgia
_________________________
(March 21, 2007)
Before TJOFLAT, BLACK and MARCUS, Circuit Judges
PER CURIAM:
Stephen M. McCusker, appointed counsel for Marcelino Ramirez Rabelo in
this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of
the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87
S. Ct. 1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record
reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct.
Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues
of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Rabelo’s conviction
and sentence are AFFIRMED.
2