Filed: Jun. 08, 2007
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS _ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT JUNE 8, 2007 No. 06-15374 THOMAS K. KAHN Non-Argument Calendar CLERK _ D. C. Docket No. 06-80007-TP-DMM UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JEFFREY PAT GADSON, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida _ (June 8, 2007) Before WILSON, PRYOR and COX, Circuit Judges PER CURIAM: Alvin E. Entin, a
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS _ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT JUNE 8, 2007 No. 06-15374 THOMAS K. KAHN Non-Argument Calendar CLERK _ D. C. Docket No. 06-80007-TP-DMM UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JEFFREY PAT GADSON, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida _ (June 8, 2007) Before WILSON, PRYOR and COX, Circuit Judges PER CURIAM: Alvin E. Entin, ap..
More
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FILED
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
________________________ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
JUNE 8, 2007
No. 06-15374 THOMAS K. KAHN
Non-Argument Calendar CLERK
________________________
D. C. Docket No. 06-80007-TP-DMM
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
JEFFREY PAT GADSON,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Florida
_________________________
(June 8, 2007)
Before WILSON, PRYOR and COX, Circuit Judges
PER CURIAM:
Alvin E. Entin, appointed counsel for Jeffrey Gadson, has filed a motion to
withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v.
California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct. 1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent
review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of
the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals
no arguable issue of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and
Gadson’s revocation of supervise release and sentence is AFFIRMED.
2