Filed: Apr. 11, 2007
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED _ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT April 11, 2007 No. 06-15653 THOMAS K. KAHN Non-Argument Calendar CLERK _ D. C. Docket No. 06-00024-CR-4-SPM-WCS UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JOSE LUIS LEDESMA, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida _ (April 11, 2007) Before DUBINA, CARNES and HILL, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Gwend
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED _ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT April 11, 2007 No. 06-15653 THOMAS K. KAHN Non-Argument Calendar CLERK _ D. C. Docket No. 06-00024-CR-4-SPM-WCS UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JOSE LUIS LEDESMA, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida _ (April 11, 2007) Before DUBINA, CARNES and HILL, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Gwendo..
More
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED
________________________ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
April 11, 2007
No. 06-15653 THOMAS K. KAHN
Non-Argument Calendar CLERK
________________________
D. C. Docket No. 06-00024-CR-4-SPM-WCS
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
JOSE LUIS LEDESMA,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Florida
_________________________
(April 11, 2007)
Before DUBINA, CARNES and HILL, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Gwendolyn Spivey, appointed counsel for Jose Luis Ledesma, has moved to
withdraw from further representation of the appellant and has filed a brief pursuant
to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct. 1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our
independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the
relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the
entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is
GRANTED, and Ledesma’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.
Ledesma’s motion to stay proceedings is DENIED.
2