Filed: Mar. 06, 2007
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS _ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT MAR 06, 2007 No. 06-15887 THOMAS K. KAHN Non-Argument Calendar CLERK _ D. C. Docket No. 06-00190-CR-2-KOB-TMP UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus REGINALD DEWAYNE HUTCHERSON, a.k.a. Main Main, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama _ (March 6, 2007) Before BLACK, MARCUS and FAY, Circuit Ju
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS _ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT MAR 06, 2007 No. 06-15887 THOMAS K. KAHN Non-Argument Calendar CLERK _ D. C. Docket No. 06-00190-CR-2-KOB-TMP UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus REGINALD DEWAYNE HUTCHERSON, a.k.a. Main Main, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama _ (March 6, 2007) Before BLACK, MARCUS and FAY, Circuit Jud..
More
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FILED
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
________________________ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
MAR 06, 2007
No. 06-15887 THOMAS K. KAHN
Non-Argument Calendar CLERK
________________________
D. C. Docket No. 06-00190-CR-2-KOB-TMP
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
REGINALD DEWAYNE HUTCHERSON,
a.k.a. Main Main,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Alabama
_________________________
(March 6, 2007)
Before BLACK, MARCUS and FAY, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Joseph A. Ingram, appointed counsel for Reginald Dewayne Hutcherson in
this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of
the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87
S. Ct. 1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record
reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct.
Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of
merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Hutcherson’s convictions
and sentences are AFFIRMED. We also construe Hutcherson’s response letter as
a motion for appointment of new counsel and a motion for extension of time to file
a response brief and DENY those motions.
2