Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Clifford Stewart, 06-16601 (2007)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Number: 06-16601 Visitors: 3
Filed: Jul. 30, 2007
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS _ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT JULY 30, 2007 No. 06-16601 THOMAS K. KAHN Non-Argument Calendar CLERK _ D. C. Docket No. 06-00007-CR-WLS-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus CLIFFORD STEWART, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Georgia _ (July 30, 2007) Before ANDERSON, BARKETT and KRAVITCH, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Gerald
More
                                                            [DO NOT PUBLISH]


              IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                                                    FILED
                       FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
                         ________________________ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                                                               JULY 30, 2007
                               No. 06-16601                  THOMAS K. KAHN
                           Non-Argument Calendar                  CLERK
                         ________________________

                    D. C. Docket No. 06-00007-CR-WLS-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


                                                      Plaintiff-Appellee,

                                     versus

CLIFFORD STEWART,

                                                      Defendant-Appellant.


                         ________________________

                  Appeal from the United States District Court
                      for the Middle District of Georgia
                       _________________________

                                (July 30, 2007)

Before ANDERSON, BARKETT and KRAVITCH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

     Gerald B. Williams, appointed counsel for Clifford Stewart, has filed a
motion to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v.

California, 
386 U.S. 738
, 
87 S. Ct. 1396
, 
18 L. Ed. 2d 493
(1967). Our independent

review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of

the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals

no arguable issue of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and

Stewart’s conviction and sentence is AFFIRMED.




                                          2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer