Filed: Jul. 09, 2007
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS _ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT JULY 9, 2007 No. 07-10307 THOMAS K. KAHN Non-Argument Calendar CLERK _ D. C. Docket No. 06-00356-CR-T-26-TGW UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ANGEL PORTOCARRERO-OBANDO, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (July 9, 2007) Before ANDERSON, BARKETT and WILSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS _ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT JULY 9, 2007 No. 07-10307 THOMAS K. KAHN Non-Argument Calendar CLERK _ D. C. Docket No. 06-00356-CR-T-26-TGW UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ANGEL PORTOCARRERO-OBANDO, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (July 9, 2007) Before ANDERSON, BARKETT and WILSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: ..
More
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FILED
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
________________________ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
JULY 9, 2007
No. 07-10307 THOMAS K. KAHN
Non-Argument Calendar CLERK
________________________
D. C. Docket No. 06-00356-CR-T-26-TGW
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
ANGEL PORTOCARRERO-OBANDO,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
_________________________
(July 9, 2007)
Before ANDERSON, BARKETT and WILSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Angelo Ferlita, appointed counsel for Angel Portocarrero-Obando in this
direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct.
1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals
counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Portocarrero-Obando’s
conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.
2