Filed: Oct. 03, 2007
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS _ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT OCTOBER 3, 2007 No. 07-10444 THOMAS K. KAHN Non-Argument Calendar CLERK _ D. C. Docket No. 06-00101-CR-KD UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus HENRY CLIFFORD JOHNSON, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Alabama _ (October 3, 2007) Before BLACK, MARCUS and WILSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Lati
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS _ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT OCTOBER 3, 2007 No. 07-10444 THOMAS K. KAHN Non-Argument Calendar CLERK _ D. C. Docket No. 06-00101-CR-KD UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus HENRY CLIFFORD JOHNSON, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Alabama _ (October 3, 2007) Before BLACK, MARCUS and WILSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Latis..
More
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FILED
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
________________________ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
OCTOBER 3, 2007
No. 07-10444 THOMAS K. KAHN
Non-Argument Calendar CLERK
________________________
D. C. Docket No. 06-00101-CR-KD
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
HENRY CLIFFORD JOHNSON,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Alabama
_________________________
(October 3, 2007)
Before BLACK, MARCUS and WILSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Latisha V. Colvin, appointed counsel for Henry Clifford Johnson on this
direct criminal appeal, has filed a motion to withdraw on appeal supported by a
brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct. 1396,
18
L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the record reveals that counsel’s
assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent
examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s
motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Johnson’s conviction and sentence are
AFFIRMED. Johnson’s motion for new counsel is, accordingly, DENIED.
2