Filed: Nov. 30, 2007
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED _ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT November 30, 2007 No. 07-10491 THOMAS K. KAHN Non-Argument Calendar CLERK _ D. C. Docket No. 03-20471-CR-ASG UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus EDDIE L. FULTON, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida _ (November 30, 2007) Before EDMONDSON, Chief Judge, WILSON and PRYOR, Circuit Judges. PE
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED _ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT November 30, 2007 No. 07-10491 THOMAS K. KAHN Non-Argument Calendar CLERK _ D. C. Docket No. 03-20471-CR-ASG UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus EDDIE L. FULTON, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida _ (November 30, 2007) Before EDMONDSON, Chief Judge, WILSON and PRYOR, Circuit Judges. PER..
More
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED
________________________ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
November 30, 2007
No. 07-10491
THOMAS K. KAHN
Non-Argument Calendar CLERK
________________________
D. C. Docket No. 03-20471-CR-ASG
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
EDDIE L. FULTON,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Florida
_________________________
(November 30, 2007)
Before EDMONDSON, Chief Judge, WILSON and PRYOR, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Nathan Clark, appointed counsel for Eddie Fulton in this direct criminal and
sentencing appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct.
1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals
that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Fulton’s convictions and
sentences are AFFIRMED.
2