Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Nigel Gray, 07-11014 (2007)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Number: 07-11014 Visitors: 7
Filed: Oct. 12, 2007
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED _ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT October 12, 2007 No. 07-11014 THOMAS K. KAHN Non-Argument Calendar CLERK _ D. C. Docket No. 04-60131-CR-WPD UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus NIGEL GRAY, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida _ (October 12, 2007) Before BLACK, MARCUS and PRYOR, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Nathan D. Clar
More
                                                           [DO NOT PUBLISH]


              IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                      FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT                     FILED
                        ________________________         U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
                                                           ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                                                               October 12, 2007
                               No. 07-11014                 THOMAS K. KAHN
                           Non-Argument Calendar                CLERK
                         ________________________

                     D. C. Docket No. 04-60131-CR-WPD

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


                                                                Plaintiff-Appellee,

                                    versus

NIGEL GRAY,

                                                          Defendant-Appellant.


                         ________________________

                 Appeal from the United States District Court
                     for the Southern District of Florida
                       _________________________

                              (October 12, 2007)

Before BLACK, MARCUS and PRYOR, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

     Nathan D. Clark, appointed counsel for Nigel Gray in this appeal, has moved
to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant

to Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
, 
87 S. Ct. 1396
, 
18 L. Ed. 2d 493
(1967). Our

independent review of the entire record reveals counsel’s assessment of the relative

merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire

record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is

GRANTED, and Gray’s sentence is AFFIRMED.




                                          2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer