Filed: Sep. 06, 2007
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS _ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT SEPTEMBER 6, 2007 No. 07-11108 THOMAS K. KAHN Non-Argument Calendar CLERK _ D. C. Docket No. 06-00009-CR-HL-5 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ROBERT LEMON JONES, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Georgia _ (September 6, 2007) Before TJOFLAT, DUBINA and CARNES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Sc
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS _ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT SEPTEMBER 6, 2007 No. 07-11108 THOMAS K. KAHN Non-Argument Calendar CLERK _ D. C. Docket No. 06-00009-CR-HL-5 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ROBERT LEMON JONES, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Georgia _ (September 6, 2007) Before TJOFLAT, DUBINA and CARNES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Sco..
More
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FILED
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
________________________ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
SEPTEMBER 6, 2007
No. 07-11108 THOMAS K. KAHN
Non-Argument Calendar CLERK
________________________
D. C. Docket No. 06-00009-CR-HL-5
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
ROBERT LEMON JONES,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Georgia
_________________________
(September 6, 2007)
Before TJOFLAT, DUBINA and CARNES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Scott Chandler Huggins, appointed counsel for Robert Lemon Jones in this
direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct.
1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals
that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Jones’s convictions and
sentences are AFFIRMED.
2