Filed: Mar. 25, 2008
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED _ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT MARCH 25, 2008 No. 07-10446 THOMAS K. KAHN Non-Argument Calendar CLERK _ D. C. Docket No. 06-00079-CR-WS UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus THOMAS EDWARD LONGMIRE, a.k.a. Tommy Longmire, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Alabama _ (March 25, 2008) Before CARNES, BARKETT and PRYOR,Circuit Jud
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED _ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT MARCH 25, 2008 No. 07-10446 THOMAS K. KAHN Non-Argument Calendar CLERK _ D. C. Docket No. 06-00079-CR-WS UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus THOMAS EDWARD LONGMIRE, a.k.a. Tommy Longmire, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Alabama _ (March 25, 2008) Before CARNES, BARKETT and PRYOR,Circuit Judg..
More
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED
________________________ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
MARCH 25, 2008
No. 07-10446
THOMAS K. KAHN
Non-Argument Calendar
CLERK
________________________
D. C. Docket No. 06-00079-CR-WS
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
THOMAS EDWARD LONGMIRE,
a.k.a. Tommy Longmire,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Alabama
_________________________
(March 25, 2008)
Before CARNES, BARKETT and PRYOR,Circuit Judges
PER CURIAM:
Dennis J. Knizley, appointed counsel for Thomas Edward Longmire in this
direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct. 1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire
record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is
correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable
issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Longmire’s
convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.
2