Filed: Mar. 05, 2008
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED _ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT March 5, 2008 No. 07-10498 THOMAS K. KAHN Non-Argument Calendar CLERK _ D. C. Docket No. 06-20415-CR-FAM UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JEAN BERTRANG CASIMIR, a.k.a. Compa, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida _ (March 5, 2008) Before TJOFLAT, ANDERSON and HULL, Circuit Judges. PER
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED _ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT March 5, 2008 No. 07-10498 THOMAS K. KAHN Non-Argument Calendar CLERK _ D. C. Docket No. 06-20415-CR-FAM UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JEAN BERTRANG CASIMIR, a.k.a. Compa, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida _ (March 5, 2008) Before TJOFLAT, ANDERSON and HULL, Circuit Judges. PER C..
More
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED
________________________ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
March 5, 2008
No. 07-10498 THOMAS K. KAHN
Non-Argument Calendar CLERK
________________________
D. C. Docket No. 06-20415-CR-FAM
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
JEAN BERTRANG CASIMIR,
a.k.a. Compa,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Florida
_________________________
(March 5, 2008)
Before TJOFLAT, ANDERSON and HULL, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
David Markus, appointed counsel for Jean Bertrang Casimir in this appeal,
has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and has filed a
brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct. 1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d
493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s
assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent
examination of the record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to
withdraw is GRANTED, and Casimir’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.
2