Filed: Jan. 31, 2008
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS _ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT JANUARY 31, 2008 THOMAS K. KAHN No. 07-11250 CLERK Non-Argument Calendar _ D. C. Docket No. 03-00489-CR-T-17-MSS UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ALBERT BAKIAJ, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (January 31, 2008) Before MARCUS, WILSON and HILL, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Ryan Tru
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS _ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT JANUARY 31, 2008 THOMAS K. KAHN No. 07-11250 CLERK Non-Argument Calendar _ D. C. Docket No. 03-00489-CR-T-17-MSS UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ALBERT BAKIAJ, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (January 31, 2008) Before MARCUS, WILSON and HILL, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Ryan Trus..
More
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FILED
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
________________________ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
JANUARY 31, 2008
THOMAS K. KAHN
No. 07-11250
CLERK
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D. C. Docket No. 03-00489-CR-T-17-MSS
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
ALBERT BAKIAJ,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
_________________________
(January 31, 2008)
Before MARCUS, WILSON and HILL, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Ryan Truskoski, appointed counsel for Albert Bakiaj in this appeal of
Bakiaj’s sentencing resulting from a resentencing hearing we ordered in Bakiaj’s
first appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant
and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct. 1396,
18
L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that
counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Bakiaj’s sentences are
AFFIRMED.
2