Filed: Feb. 01, 2008
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS _ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FEBRUARY 1, 2008 THOMAS K. KAHN No. 07-12056 CLERK Non-Argument Calendar _ D. C. Docket No. 06-00438-CR-KOB-PWG UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus WILLIAM EARL ERVIN, JR. Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama _ (February 1, 2008) Before BIRCH, DUBINA and WILSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIA
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS _ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FEBRUARY 1, 2008 THOMAS K. KAHN No. 07-12056 CLERK Non-Argument Calendar _ D. C. Docket No. 06-00438-CR-KOB-PWG UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus WILLIAM EARL ERVIN, JR. Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama _ (February 1, 2008) Before BIRCH, DUBINA and WILSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM..
More
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FILED
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
________________________ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
FEBRUARY 1, 2008
THOMAS K. KAHN
No. 07-12056
CLERK
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D. C. Docket No. 06-00438-CR-KOB-PWG
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
WILLIAM EARL ERVIN, JR.
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Alabama
_________________________
(February 1, 2008)
Before BIRCH, DUBINA and WILSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
James L. O’Kelley, appointed counsel for William Earl Ervin, Jr., has filed a
motion to withdraw on appeal supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v.
California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct. 1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent
review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of
the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals
no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and
Ervin’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.
2