Filed: Jan. 04, 2008
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS _ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT JAN 04 2008 No. 07-13109 THOMAS K. KAHN Non-Argument Calendar CLERK _ D. C. Docket No. 06-00020-CR-J-20HTS UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus OBDULIO GONZALEZ-NAVAS, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (January 4, 2008) Before CARNES, BARKETT and WILSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Lyn
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS _ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT JAN 04 2008 No. 07-13109 THOMAS K. KAHN Non-Argument Calendar CLERK _ D. C. Docket No. 06-00020-CR-J-20HTS UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus OBDULIO GONZALEZ-NAVAS, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (January 4, 2008) Before CARNES, BARKETT and WILSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Lynn..
More
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FILED
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
________________________ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
JAN 04 2008
No. 07-13109 THOMAS K. KAHN
Non-Argument Calendar CLERK
________________________
D. C. Docket No. 06-00020-CR-J-20HTS
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
OBDULIO GONZALEZ-NAVAS,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
_________________________
(January 4, 2008)
Before CARNES, BARKETT and WILSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Lynn Palmer Bailey, appointed counsel for Obdulio Gonzalez-Navas in this
appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and
filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct. 1396,
18
L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that
counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Gonzalez-Navas’s revocation of
supervised release and resulting sentence are AFFIRMED.
2