Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Wardell Gordon, 07-13123 (2008)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Number: 07-13123 Visitors: 4
Filed: Aug. 01, 2008
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED _ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT Aug. 1, 2008 No. 07-13123 THOMAS K. KAHN Non-Argument Calendar CLERK _ D. C. Docket No. 06-00078-CR-4-SPM-WCS UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus WARDELL GORDON, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida _ (August 1, 2008) Before TJOFLAT, MARCUS and WILSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Noel G.
More
                                                          [DO NOT PUBLISH]


              IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                      FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT                    FILED
                        ________________________         U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
                                                           ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                                                                Aug. 1, 2008
                              No. 07-13123                  THOMAS K. KAHN
                          Non-Argument Calendar                 CLERK
                        ________________________

                 D. C. Docket No. 06-00078-CR-4-SPM-WCS

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


                                                                Plaintiff-Appellee,

                                   versus

WARDELL GORDON,

                                                          Defendant-Appellant.


                        ________________________

                 Appeal from the United States District Court
                     for the Northern District of Florida
                       _________________________

                              (August 1, 2008)

Before TJOFLAT, MARCUS and WILSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

     Noel G. Lawrence, appointed counsel for Wardell Gordon, has filed a
motion to withdraw on appeal supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v.

California, 
386 U.S. 738
, 
87 S. Ct. 1396
, 
18 L. Ed. 2d 493
(1967). Our independent

review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of

the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals

no issues of arguable merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED and

Gordon’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.




                                          2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer