Filed: Mar. 26, 2008
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED _ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 07-14577 March 26, 2008 Non-Argument Calendar THOMAS K. KAHN CLERK _ D. C. Docket No. 99-00069-CR-ORL-19-KRS UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus DONALD MITCHELL, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (March 26, 2008) Before TJOFLAT, BLACK and PRYOR, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Peter W
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED _ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 07-14577 March 26, 2008 Non-Argument Calendar THOMAS K. KAHN CLERK _ D. C. Docket No. 99-00069-CR-ORL-19-KRS UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus DONALD MITCHELL, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (March 26, 2008) Before TJOFLAT, BLACK and PRYOR, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Peter Wa..
More
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED
________________________ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
No. 07-14577 March 26, 2008
Non-Argument Calendar THOMAS K. KAHN
CLERK
________________________
D. C. Docket No. 99-00069-CR-ORL-19-KRS
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
DONALD MITCHELL,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
_________________________
(March 26, 2008)
Before TJOFLAT, BLACK and PRYOR, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Peter Warren Kenny, appointed counsel for Donald Mitchell in this appeal
of the revocation of Mitchell’s supervised release and subsequent sentence, has
moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief
pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct. 1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493
(1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s
assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent
examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s
motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the revocation of Mitchell’s supervised
release and subsequent sentence are AFFIRMED.
2