Filed: Aug. 01, 2008
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS _ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT AUGUST 1, 2008 No. 07-14984 THOMAS K. KAHN Non-Argument Calendar CLERK _ D. C. Docket No. 06-00435-CR-CC-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus CORY SEIGNIOUS, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia _ (August 1, 2008) Before ANDERSON, PRYOR and FAY, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: R. Gary Spenc
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS _ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT AUGUST 1, 2008 No. 07-14984 THOMAS K. KAHN Non-Argument Calendar CLERK _ D. C. Docket No. 06-00435-CR-CC-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus CORY SEIGNIOUS, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia _ (August 1, 2008) Before ANDERSON, PRYOR and FAY, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: R. Gary Spence..
More
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FILED
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
________________________ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
AUGUST 1, 2008
No. 07-14984 THOMAS K. KAHN
Non-Argument Calendar CLERK
________________________
D. C. Docket No. 06-00435-CR-CC-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
CORY SEIGNIOUS,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Georgia
_________________________
(August 1, 2008)
Before ANDERSON, PRYOR and FAY, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
R. Gary Spencer, appointed counsel for Cory Seignious in this appeal, has
moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and has filed a
brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct. 1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d
493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s
assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent
examination of the record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to
withdraw is GRANTED, and Seignious’s convictions and sentences are
AFFIRMED.
2