Filed: Jun. 19, 2008
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS _ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT JUNE 19, 2008 No. 07-15337 THOMAS K. KAHN Non-Argument Calendar CLERK _ D. C. Docket No. 05-00337-CR-J-25-MMH UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus OSCAR LEE REEVES, a.k.a. Boo, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (June 19, 2008) Before MARCUS, PRYOR and HILL, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS _ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT JUNE 19, 2008 No. 07-15337 THOMAS K. KAHN Non-Argument Calendar CLERK _ D. C. Docket No. 05-00337-CR-J-25-MMH UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus OSCAR LEE REEVES, a.k.a. Boo, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (June 19, 2008) Before MARCUS, PRYOR and HILL, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: ..
More
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FILED
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
________________________ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
JUNE 19, 2008
No. 07-15337 THOMAS K. KAHN
Non-Argument Calendar CLERK
________________________
D. C. Docket No. 05-00337-CR-J-25-MMH
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
OSCAR LEE REEVES,
a.k.a. Boo,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
_________________________
(June 19, 2008)
Before MARCUS, PRYOR and HILL, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
James A. Hernandez, appointed counsel for Oscar Lee Reeves in this direct
criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct. 1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire
record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is
correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable
issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Reeves’s
convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.
2