Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Mercutio Stokes, 08-10088 (2008)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Number: 08-10088 Visitors: 2
Filed: Jul. 30, 2008
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS _ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT JULY 30, 2008 No. 08-10088 THOMAS K. KAHN Non-Argument Calendar CLERK _ D. C. Docket No. 07-00104-CR-ORL-22KRS UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus MERCUTIO STOKES, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (July 30, 2008) Before BARKETT, MARCUS and WILSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Travis W
More
                                                           [DO NOT PUBLISH]


              IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                                                     FILED
                      FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
                        ________________________ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                                                              JULY 30, 2008
                               No. 08-10088                 THOMAS K. KAHN
                           Non-Argument Calendar                 CLERK
                         ________________________

                 D. C. Docket No. 07-00104-CR-ORL-22KRS

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


                                                                 Plaintiff-Appellee,

                                    versus

MERCUTIO STOKES,

                                                           Defendant-Appellant.


                         ________________________

                  Appeal from the United States District Court
                      for the Middle District of Florida
                       _________________________

                                (July 30, 2008)

Before BARKETT, MARCUS and WILSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

     Travis Williams, appointed counsel for Mercutio Stokes, has filed a motion
to withdraw on appeal supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v.

California, 
386 U.S. 738
, 
87 S. Ct. 1396
, 
18 L. Ed. 2d 493
(1967). Our independent

review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of

the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals

no issues of arguable merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED and

Stokes’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.




                                          2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer