Filed: Aug. 11, 2008
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED _ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT Aug. 11, 2008 No. 08-10148 THOMAS K. KAHN Non-Argument Calendar CLERK _ D. C. Docket No. 05-00372-CR-08-WSD-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus VICTOR HUGO DORANTES-HERNANDEZ, a.k.a. Victor Doranten, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia _ (August 11, 2008) Before TJOFLAT, CARNES and BA
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED _ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT Aug. 11, 2008 No. 08-10148 THOMAS K. KAHN Non-Argument Calendar CLERK _ D. C. Docket No. 05-00372-CR-08-WSD-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus VICTOR HUGO DORANTES-HERNANDEZ, a.k.a. Victor Doranten, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia _ (August 11, 2008) Before TJOFLAT, CARNES and BAR..
More
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED
________________________ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
Aug. 11, 2008
No. 08-10148 THOMAS K. KAHN
Non-Argument Calendar CLERK
________________________
D. C. Docket No. 05-00372-CR-08-WSD-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
VICTOR HUGO DORANTES-HERNANDEZ,
a.k.a. Victor Doranten,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Georgia
_________________________
(August 11, 2008)
Before TJOFLAT, CARNES and BARKETT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
S. Ralph Martin, Jr., counsel for Victor Dorantes-Hernandez in this direct
criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct.
1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals
that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Hernandez’s conviction and
sentence is AFFIRMED.
2