Filed: Jul. 03, 2008
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED _ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT July 3, 2008 No. 08-10301 THOMAS K. KAHN Non-Argument Calendar CLERK _ D. C. Docket No. 07-00126-CR-CG UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ARTHUR JAMES WILLIAMS, JR., a.k.a. Sonny Love, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Alabama _ (July 3, 2008) Before EDMONDSON, Chief Judge, ANDERSON and HULL
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED _ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT July 3, 2008 No. 08-10301 THOMAS K. KAHN Non-Argument Calendar CLERK _ D. C. Docket No. 07-00126-CR-CG UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ARTHUR JAMES WILLIAMS, JR., a.k.a. Sonny Love, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Alabama _ (July 3, 2008) Before EDMONDSON, Chief Judge, ANDERSON and HULL,..
More
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED
________________________ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
July 3, 2008
No. 08-10301 THOMAS K. KAHN
Non-Argument Calendar CLERK
________________________
D. C. Docket No. 07-00126-CR-CG
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
ARTHUR JAMES WILLIAMS, JR.,
a.k.a. Sonny Love,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Alabama
_________________________
(July 3, 2008)
Before EDMONDSON, Chief Judge, ANDERSON and HULL, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Kristen Gartman Rogers, appointed counsel for Arthur James Williams, Jr.,
in this appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant
and has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct. 1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that
counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Williams’s conviction and
sentence are AFFIRMED.
2