Filed: Oct. 06, 2008
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS _ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT OCT 6, 2008 No. 08-10959 THOMAS K. KAHN Non-Argument Calendar CLERK _ D. C. Docket No. 04-20139-CR-JEM UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus MARIO MELO, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida _ (October 6, 2008) Before BIRCH, CARNES and BARKETT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Neal Gary Rosenswe
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS _ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT OCT 6, 2008 No. 08-10959 THOMAS K. KAHN Non-Argument Calendar CLERK _ D. C. Docket No. 04-20139-CR-JEM UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus MARIO MELO, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida _ (October 6, 2008) Before BIRCH, CARNES and BARKETT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Neal Gary Rosenswei..
More
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FILED
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
________________________ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
OCT 6, 2008
No. 08-10959 THOMAS K. KAHN
Non-Argument Calendar CLERK
________________________
D. C. Docket No. 04-20139-CR-JEM
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
MARIO MELO,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Florida
_________________________
(October 6, 2008)
Before BIRCH, CARNES and BARKETT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Neal Gary Rosensweig, counsel for Mario Melo, has filed a motion to
withdraw on appeal supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v.
California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct. 1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Because our
independent review of the entire record reveals no issues of arguable merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED and Melo’s sentence following
re-sentencing is AFFIRMED. We DENY as moot Melo’s motion to dismiss
counsel on appeal, and we DENY Melo’s motions to dismiss his appeal and/or
hold his appeal in abeyance.
2