Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Mario Melo, 08-10959 (2008)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Number: 08-10959 Visitors: 46
Filed: Oct. 06, 2008
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS _ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT OCT 6, 2008 No. 08-10959 THOMAS K. KAHN Non-Argument Calendar CLERK _ D. C. Docket No. 04-20139-CR-JEM UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus MARIO MELO, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida _ (October 6, 2008) Before BIRCH, CARNES and BARKETT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Neal Gary Rosenswe
More
                                                          [DO NOT PUBLISH]


             IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                                                 FILED
                      FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
                       ________________________  ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                                                             OCT 6, 2008
                              No. 08-10959                 THOMAS K. KAHN
                          Non-Argument Calendar                CLERK
                        ________________________

                    D. C. Docket No. 04-20139-CR-JEM

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


                                                            Plaintiff-Appellee,

                                   versus

MARIO MELO,

                                                         Defendant-Appellant.


                        ________________________

                 Appeal from the United States District Court
                     for the Southern District of Florida
                       _________________________

                             (October 6, 2008)

Before BIRCH, CARNES and BARKETT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

     Neal Gary Rosensweig, counsel for Mario Melo, has filed a motion to
withdraw on appeal supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v.

California, 
386 U.S. 738
, 
87 S. Ct. 1396
, 
18 L. Ed. 2d 493
(1967). Because our

independent review of the entire record reveals no issues of arguable merit,

counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED and Melo’s sentence following

re-sentencing is AFFIRMED. We DENY as moot Melo’s motion to dismiss

counsel on appeal, and we DENY Melo’s motions to dismiss his appeal and/or

hold his appeal in abeyance.




                                         2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer