Filed: Nov. 07, 2008
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED _ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT NOV 7, 2008 No. 08-11068 THOMAS K. KAHN Non-Argument Calendar CLERK _ D. C. Docket No. 07-00171-CR-ORL-19KRS UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus NOEL RODRIGUEZ-CERVANTES, a.k.a. Noel Delgado, a.k.a. Atero Ramirez, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (November 7, 2008) Before ANDERSON, M
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED _ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT NOV 7, 2008 No. 08-11068 THOMAS K. KAHN Non-Argument Calendar CLERK _ D. C. Docket No. 07-00171-CR-ORL-19KRS UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus NOEL RODRIGUEZ-CERVANTES, a.k.a. Noel Delgado, a.k.a. Atero Ramirez, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (November 7, 2008) Before ANDERSON, MA..
More
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED
________________________ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
NOV 7, 2008
No. 08-11068
THOMAS K. KAHN
Non-Argument Calendar
CLERK
________________________
D. C. Docket No. 07-00171-CR-ORL-19KRS
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
NOEL RODRIGUEZ-CERVANTES,
a.k.a. Noel Delgado,
a.k.a. Atero Ramirez,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
_________________________
(November 7, 2008)
Before ANDERSON, MARCUS and HILL, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Clarence W. Counts, counsel for Noel Rodriguez-Cervantes, has filed a
motion to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v.
California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct. 1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent
review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit
of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record
reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED,
and Rodriguez-Cervantes’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.
2