Judges: Edmondson, Chief Judge, and Tjoflat, Birch, Dubina, Black, Carnes, Barkett, Hull, Marcus, Wilson, and Pryor, Circuit Judges
Filed: May 29, 2009
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: 569 F.3d 1290 (2009) Ingrid REEVES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. C.H. ROBINSON WORLDWIDE, INC., Defendant-Appellee. No. 07-10270. United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit. May 29, 2009. Douglas L. Micko, Sprenger & Lang, PLLC, Minneapolis, MN, Byron Renard Perkins, Cochran Firm, Birmingham, AL, Kell A. Simon, Ross Melton, PC, Austin, TX, Michael D. Lieder, Sprenger & Lang, PLLC, Washington, DC, for Plaintiff-Appellant. Margaret Campbell, Ogletree Deakins Nash Smoak & Stewart, P.C., Atlanta, G
Summary: 569 F.3d 1290 (2009) Ingrid REEVES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. C.H. ROBINSON WORLDWIDE, INC., Defendant-Appellee. No. 07-10270. United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit. May 29, 2009. Douglas L. Micko, Sprenger & Lang, PLLC, Minneapolis, MN, Byron Renard Perkins, Cochran Firm, Birmingham, AL, Kell A. Simon, Ross Melton, PC, Austin, TX, Michael D. Lieder, Sprenger & Lang, PLLC, Washington, DC, for Plaintiff-Appellant. Margaret Campbell, Ogletree Deakins Nash Smoak & Stewart, P.C., Atlanta, GA..
More
569 F.3d 1290 (2009)
Ingrid REEVES, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
C.H. ROBINSON WORLDWIDE, INC., Defendant-Appellee.
No. 07-10270.
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
May 29, 2009.
Douglas L. Micko, Sprenger & Lang, PLLC, Minneapolis, MN, Byron Renard Perkins, Cochran Firm, Birmingham, AL, Kell A. Simon, Ross Melton, PC, Austin, TX, Michael D. Lieder, Sprenger & Lang, PLLC, Washington, DC, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
Margaret Campbell, Ogletree Deakins Nash Smoak & Stewart, P.C., Atlanta, GA, David Lynn Warren, Jr., Sandra B. Reiss, Christopher A. Mixon, Ogletree Deakins Nash Smoak & Stewart, P.C., Birmingham, AL, for Defendant-Appellee.
Before EDMONDSON, Chief Judge, and TJOFLAT, BIRCH, DUBINA, BLACK, CARNES, BARKETT, HULL, MARCUS, WILSON, and PRYOR, Circuit Judges.
BY THE COURT:
A member of this Court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion of rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in this Court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,
IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court en banc. The previous panel's opinion is hereby VACATED.
