Filed: Jan. 08, 2009
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 07-10404 JANUARY 8, 2009 Non-Argument Calendar THOMAS K. KAHN _ CLERK D. C. Docket No. 04-00173-CR-1-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus SALVADOR ONTANON-MALDONADO, a.k.a. Chava a.k.a. Oaxaco, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia _ (January 8, 2009) Before TJOFLAT, DUBINA and PRYOR
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 07-10404 JANUARY 8, 2009 Non-Argument Calendar THOMAS K. KAHN _ CLERK D. C. Docket No. 04-00173-CR-1-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus SALVADOR ONTANON-MALDONADO, a.k.a. Chava a.k.a. Oaxaco, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia _ (January 8, 2009) Before TJOFLAT, DUBINA and PRYOR,..
More
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________ FILED
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
No. 07-10404
JANUARY 8, 2009
Non-Argument Calendar THOMAS K. KAHN
________________________ CLERK
D. C. Docket No. 04-00173-CR-1-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
SALVADOR ONTANON-MALDONADO,
a.k.a. Chava
a.k.a. Oaxaco,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Georgia
_________________________
(January 8, 2009)
Before TJOFLAT, DUBINA and PRYOR, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Patrick D. Deering, retained counsel for Salvador Ontanon-Maldonado in
this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of
the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87
S. Ct. 1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the record reveals
that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Therefore,
as independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Ontanon-Maldonado’s
conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.
2