Filed: Aug. 12, 2009
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS _ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT AUGUST 12, 2009 No. 07-11491 THOMAS K. KAHN Non-Argument Calendar CLERK _ D. C. Docket No. 06-00125-CR-ORL-19-KRS UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus DWAYNE ARNETT TOOMER, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (August 12, 2009) Before EDMONDSON, MARCUS and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges. PER CU
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS _ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT AUGUST 12, 2009 No. 07-11491 THOMAS K. KAHN Non-Argument Calendar CLERK _ D. C. Docket No. 06-00125-CR-ORL-19-KRS UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus DWAYNE ARNETT TOOMER, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (August 12, 2009) Before EDMONDSON, MARCUS and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges. PER CUR..
More
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FILED
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
________________________ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
AUGUST 12, 2009
No. 07-11491 THOMAS K. KAHN
Non-Argument Calendar CLERK
________________________
D. C. Docket No. 06-00125-CR-ORL-19-KRS
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
DWAYNE ARNETT TOOMER,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
_________________________
(August 12, 2009)
Before EDMONDSON, MARCUS and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Kirby G. Oberdorfer, appointed counsel for Dwayne Arnett Toomer, has
moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant, because, in her
opinion, the appeal is without merit. Counsel has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v.
California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct. 1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent
review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of
the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals
no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and
Toomer’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.
2