Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Raymond Lee Kelly, 08-13988 (2009)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Number: 08-13988 Visitors: 2
Filed: Mar. 20, 2009
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED _ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 08-13988 MAR 20, 2009 Non-Argument Calendar THOMAS K. KAHN CLERK _ D. C. Docket No. 07-00134-CR-ORL-19KRS UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus RAYMOND LEE KELLY, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (March 20, 2009) Before BIRCH, HULL and KRAVITCH, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Roger L.
More
                                                          [DO NOT PUBLISH]


             IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                      FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT            FILED
                        ________________________ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
                                                          ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                              No. 08-13988                   MAR 20, 2009
                          Non-Argument Calendar            THOMAS K. KAHN
                                                               CLERK
                        ________________________

                 D. C. Docket No. 07-00134-CR-ORL-19KRS

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


                                                                Plaintiff-Appellee,

                                   versus

RAYMOND LEE KELLY,

                                                          Defendant-Appellant.


                        ________________________

                 Appeal from the United States District Court
                     for the Middle District of Florida
                      _________________________

                              (March 20, 2009)

Before BIRCH, HULL and KRAVITCH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

     Roger L. Weeden, appointed counsel for Raymond Lee Kelly in this direct
criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the

appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
, 
87 S. Ct. 1396
, 
18 L. Ed. 2d 493
(1967). Because independent examination of the entire

record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is

GRANTED and Kelly’s convictions and sentence are AFFIRMED.




                                          2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer