Filed: Mar. 06, 2009
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED _ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 08-14711 MARCH 6, 2009 Non-Argument Calendar THOMAS K. KAHN CLERK _ D. C. Docket No. 94-00033-CR-J-10 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ROBERT GLENDON ALLICOCK, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (March 6, 2009) Before TJOFLAT, DUBINA and COX, Circuit Judges PER CURIAM: James H.
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED _ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 08-14711 MARCH 6, 2009 Non-Argument Calendar THOMAS K. KAHN CLERK _ D. C. Docket No. 94-00033-CR-J-10 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ROBERT GLENDON ALLICOCK, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (March 6, 2009) Before TJOFLAT, DUBINA and COX, Circuit Judges PER CURIAM: James H. B..
More
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED
________________________ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-14711 MARCH 6, 2009
Non-Argument Calendar THOMAS K. KAHN
CLERK
________________________
D. C. Docket No. 94-00033-CR-J-10
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
ROBERT GLENDON ALLICOCK,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
_________________________
(March 6, 2009)
Before TJOFLAT, DUBINA and COX, Circuit Judges
PER CURIAM:
James H. Burke, Jr., appointed counsel for Robert Glendon Allicock in this
appeal of the district court’s partial grant of Allicock’s motion for sentence reduction,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582, has moved to withdraw from further representation of
appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct.
1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals
that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s partial grant of
Allicock’s § 3582(c)(2) motion to reduce sentence is AFFIRMED.
2