Filed: May 18, 2009
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS _ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT May 18, 2009 No. 08-15178 THOMAS K. KAHN Non-Argument Calendar CLERK _ D. C. Docket No. 08-00008-CR-ORL-31DAB UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JAMES R. GAINES, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (May 18, 2009) Before BLACK, MARCUS and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Peter Warr
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS _ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT May 18, 2009 No. 08-15178 THOMAS K. KAHN Non-Argument Calendar CLERK _ D. C. Docket No. 08-00008-CR-ORL-31DAB UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JAMES R. GAINES, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (May 18, 2009) Before BLACK, MARCUS and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Peter Warre..
More
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FILED
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
________________________ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
May 18, 2009
No. 08-15178 THOMAS K. KAHN
Non-Argument Calendar CLERK
________________________
D. C. Docket No. 08-00008-CR-ORL-31DAB
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
JAMES R. GAINES,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
_________________________
(May 18, 2009)
Before BLACK, MARCUS and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Peter Warren Kenny, appointed counsel for James R. Gaines in this direct
criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct.
1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals
that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Gaines’s conviction and
sentence are AFFIRMED.
2