Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Desburn Pinnock, 08-15403 (2009)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Number: 08-15403 Visitors: 46
Filed: Jun. 04, 2009
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS _ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT JUNE 4, 2009 No. 08-15403 THOMAS K. KAHN Non-Argument Calendar CLERK _ D. C. Docket No. 97-00483-CR-T-17-EJA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus DESBURN PINNOCK, a.k.a. Bull, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (June 4, 2009) Before DUBINA, Chief Judge, TJOFLAT and HILL, Circuit Judges.
More
                                                          [DO NOT PUBLISH]


              IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                                                    FILED
                      FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
                        ________________________ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                                                              JUNE 4, 2009
                               No. 08-15403                 THOMAS K. KAHN
                           Non-Argument Calendar                CLERK
                         ________________________

                  D. C. Docket No. 97-00483-CR-T-17-EJA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


                                                                Plaintiff-Appellee,

                                    versus

DESBURN PINNOCK,
a.k.a. Bull,

                                                          Defendant-Appellant.


                         ________________________

                 Appeal from the United States District Court
                     for the Middle District of Florida
                      _________________________

                                (June 4, 2009)

Before DUBINA, Chief Judge, TJOFLAT and HILL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

     James Wesley Smith III, appointed counsel for Desburn Pinnock, has filed a
motion to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v.

California, 
386 U.S. 738
, 
87 S. Ct. 1396
, 
18 L. Ed. 2d 493
(1967). Our independent

review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of

the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals

no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the

district court’s denial of Pinnock’s 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motion is AFFIRMED.




                                          2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer