Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Alan Eason, 08-15952 (2009)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Number: 08-15952
Filed: May 07, 2009
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED _ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 08-15952 MAY 7, 2009 Non-Argument Calendar THOMAS K. KAHN CLERK _ D. C. Docket No. 97-00053-CR-J-34-TEM UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ALAN EASON, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (May 7, 2009) Before DUBINA, PRYOR and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: W. Charles Fletche
More
                                                            [DO NOT PUBLISH]


              IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                       FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT            FILED
                         ________________________ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
                                                            ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                               No. 08-15952                    MAY 7, 2009
                           Non-Argument Calendar             THOMAS K. KAHN
                                                                 CLERK
                         ________________________

                  D. C. Docket No. 97-00053-CR-J-34-TEM

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


                                                                 Plaintiff-Appellee,

                                    versus

ALAN EASON,

                                                            Defendant-Appellant.


                         ________________________

                  Appeal from the United States District Court
                      for the Middle District of Florida
                       _________________________

                                 (May 7, 2009)

Before DUBINA, PRYOR and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

     W. Charles Fletcher, appointed counsel for Alan Eason in this appeal, has
moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief

pursuant to Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
, 
87 S. Ct. 1396
, 
18 L. Ed. 2d 493
(1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s

assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent

examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s

motion to withdraw is GRANTED and Eason’s revocation of supervised release

and resulting sentence are AFFIRMED. Eason’s request for appointment of

appellate counsel is accordingly DENIED AS MOOT.




                                          2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer