Filed: May 07, 2009
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED _ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 08-15952 MAY 7, 2009 Non-Argument Calendar THOMAS K. KAHN CLERK _ D. C. Docket No. 97-00053-CR-J-34-TEM UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ALAN EASON, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (May 7, 2009) Before DUBINA, PRYOR and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: W. Charles Fletche
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED _ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 08-15952 MAY 7, 2009 Non-Argument Calendar THOMAS K. KAHN CLERK _ D. C. Docket No. 97-00053-CR-J-34-TEM UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ALAN EASON, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (May 7, 2009) Before DUBINA, PRYOR and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: W. Charles Fletcher..
More
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED
________________________ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-15952 MAY 7, 2009
Non-Argument Calendar THOMAS K. KAHN
CLERK
________________________
D. C. Docket No. 97-00053-CR-J-34-TEM
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
ALAN EASON,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
_________________________
(May 7, 2009)
Before DUBINA, PRYOR and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
W. Charles Fletcher, appointed counsel for Alan Eason in this appeal, has
moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief
pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct. 1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493
(1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s
assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent
examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s
motion to withdraw is GRANTED and Eason’s revocation of supervised release
and resulting sentence are AFFIRMED. Eason’s request for appointment of
appellate counsel is accordingly DENIED AS MOOT.
2