Filed: May 07, 2009
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS No. 08-16705 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT MAY 7, 2009 Non-Argument Calendar THOMAS K. KAHN _ CLERK D. C. Docket No. 04-10031-CR-KMM UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus PEDRO JUAN TORRES, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida _ (May 7, 2009) Before CARNES, WILSON and COX, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Robin J. Farnswort
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS No. 08-16705 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT MAY 7, 2009 Non-Argument Calendar THOMAS K. KAHN _ CLERK D. C. Docket No. 04-10031-CR-KMM UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus PEDRO JUAN TORRES, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida _ (May 7, 2009) Before CARNES, WILSON and COX, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Robin J. Farnsworth..
More
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________ FILED
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
No. 08-16705 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
MAY 7, 2009
Non-Argument Calendar
THOMAS K. KAHN
________________________
CLERK
D. C. Docket No. 04-10031-CR-KMM
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
PEDRO JUAN TORRES,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Florida
_________________________
(May 7, 2009)
Before CARNES, WILSON and COX, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Robin J. Farnsworth, appointed counsel for Pedro Juan Torres in this appeal
from the revocation of supervised release and sentence imposed upon revocation,
has filed a motion to withdraw on appeal supported by a brief prepared pursuant to
Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct. 1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our
independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the
relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the
entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is
GRANTED, and the revocation of supervised release and Torres’s sentence are
AFFIRMED.
2