Filed: Oct. 13, 2009
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS _ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT Oct. 13, 2009 No. 08-16817 THOMAS K. KAHN Non-Argument Calendar CLERK _ D. C. Docket No. 07-00296-CR-J-34-JRK UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ROBERT BELTZ, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (October 13, 2009) Before MARCUS, WILSON and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Louis R.
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS _ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT Oct. 13, 2009 No. 08-16817 THOMAS K. KAHN Non-Argument Calendar CLERK _ D. C. Docket No. 07-00296-CR-J-34-JRK UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ROBERT BELTZ, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (October 13, 2009) Before MARCUS, WILSON and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Louis R. ..
More
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FILED
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
________________________ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
Oct. 13, 2009
No. 08-16817 THOMAS K. KAHN
Non-Argument Calendar CLERK
________________________
D. C. Docket No. 07-00296-CR-J-34-JRK
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
ROBERT BELTZ,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
_________________________
(October 13, 2009)
Before MARCUS, WILSON and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Louis R. Hardin, appointed counsel for Robert Beltz in this direct criminal
appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant
because, in his opinion, the appeal is without merit. Counsel has filed a brief
pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct. 1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493
(1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s
assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent
examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s
motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Beltz’s conviction and sentence are
AFFIRMED.
2