Filed: Oct. 09, 2009
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS _ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT Oct. 9, 2009 No. 08-16897 THOMAS K. KAHN Non-Argument Calendar CLERK _ D. C. Docket No. 08-00126-CR-J-32-JRK UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ROBERT FRANCIS BRICKER, a.k.a. Stratocon, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (October 9, 2009) Before DUBINA, Chief Judge, BLACK and BARKETT,
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS _ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT Oct. 9, 2009 No. 08-16897 THOMAS K. KAHN Non-Argument Calendar CLERK _ D. C. Docket No. 08-00126-CR-J-32-JRK UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ROBERT FRANCIS BRICKER, a.k.a. Stratocon, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (October 9, 2009) Before DUBINA, Chief Judge, BLACK and BARKETT, ..
More
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FILED
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
________________________ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
Oct. 9, 2009
No. 08-16897 THOMAS K. KAHN
Non-Argument Calendar CLERK
________________________
D. C. Docket No. 08-00126-CR-J-32-JRK
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
ROBERT FRANCIS BRICKER,
a.k.a. Stratocon,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
_________________________
(October 9, 2009)
Before DUBINA, Chief Judge, BLACK and BARKETT, Circuit Judges
PER CURIAM:
W. Charles Fletcher, appointed counsel for Robert Francis Bricker in this
direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct.
1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals
that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Bricker’s conviction and
sentence are AFFIRMED.
2