Filed: Oct. 02, 2009
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS _ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT OCTOBER 2, 2009 No. 09-10132 THOMAS K. KAHN CLERK Non-Argument Calendar _ D. C. Docket No. 08-60165-CR-WPD UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ANTHONY DEHANEY, a.k.a. Ewart Dehaney, a.k.a. Ewart Anthony Dehaney, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida _ (October 2, 2009) Before TJOFLAT, EDM
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS _ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT OCTOBER 2, 2009 No. 09-10132 THOMAS K. KAHN CLERK Non-Argument Calendar _ D. C. Docket No. 08-60165-CR-WPD UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ANTHONY DEHANEY, a.k.a. Ewart Dehaney, a.k.a. Ewart Anthony Dehaney, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida _ (October 2, 2009) Before TJOFLAT, EDMO..
More
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FILED
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
________________________ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
OCTOBER 2, 2009
No. 09-10132 THOMAS K. KAHN
CLERK
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D. C. Docket No. 08-60165-CR-WPD
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
ANTHONY DEHANEY,
a.k.a. Ewart Dehaney,
a.k.a. Ewart Anthony Dehaney,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Florida
_________________________
(October 2, 2009)
Before TJOFLAT, EDMONDSON and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Alvin E. Entin, appointed counsel for Anthony Dehaney in this direct
criminal appeal, has filed a motion to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief
prepared pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct. 1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d
493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s
assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent
examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s
motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Dehaney’s convictions and sentences are
AFFIRMED.
2